Re: [TCLUG:4936] routing

[Gabe Turner <dopp@acm.cs.umn.edu>]

Here's my routing table (I, like Mike, also noticed the netaddress
redundancy after upgrading to 2.1.x and now to 2.2.3)

dopp:~$ netstat -rn
Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags   MSS Window  irtt
Iface
209.32.152.192  0.0.0.0         255.255.255.252 U         0 0          0
eth0
209.32.152.192  0.0.0.0         255.255.255.252 U         0 0          0
eth0
0.0.0.0         192.168.1.1     255.255.255.0   UG        0 0          0
eth1
192.168.1.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U         0 0          0
eth1
192.168.1.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U         0 0          0
eth1
127.0.0.0       0.0.0.0         255.0.0.0       U         0 0          0
lo
0.0.0.0         209.32.152.194  0.0.0.0         UG        0 0          0
eth0

This is my network server and I don't have any problems connecting.  I'm
not sure, but I think telnet looks at /etc/hosts.  You may want to make
sure that you have all your machines listed in each others hosts files.

I'm using the line

/sbin/route add default gw 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 metric 1

to setup my gateway.  Are you doing something similar?

Gabe
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gabe Turner <dopp@acm.cs.umn.edu>       
U of MN Csci/IT Systems Staff
Systems Staff Manager - ACM @ U of MN

"Blood is life and it shall be all ours!" -Dimmu Borgir "The Night Masquerade"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Sat, 20 Mar 1999, Serge M. Egelman wrote:

> hello,
>     When I telnet in to my second linux box, it takes ages to connect.
> I'm thinking that this may be a routing problem, but am unsure.  Here is
> a printout of my routing tables (using route -n):
> Kernel IP routing table
> 
> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use
> Iface
> 192.168.1.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0
> eth0
> 192.168.1.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0
> eth0
> 127.0.0.0       0.0.0.0         255.0.0.0       U     0      0        0
> lo
> 0.0.0.0         192.168.1.1     0.0.0.0         UG    1      0        0
> eth0
> 
> It looks like the first two identical entries might be the problem?  I
> am unsure and am also unsure how I go about getting rid of them.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> serge
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe@listserv.real-time.com
> For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help@listserv.real-time.com
> Try our website: http://tclug.real-time.com
>