Re: [TCLUG:6042] swap > 128M

[Christopher Palmer <reid@pconline.com>]

On Sun, 16 May 1999, Nate Carlson wrote:

> Hmmm, that's odd. I know 2.1.x supported it out of the box... I had a
> 512mb swap file running fine once. Could be they decided to drop the
> feature..

Is there any chance you only *thought* it was seeing all 512MB, when in
reality it was just using the first 128MB? I've never heard of any version
of Linux understanding swap partitions greater than 128MB in size.


-- Chris

---------(( Christopher Reid Palmer : http://innerfire.visi.com/ ))---------