Re: [TCLUG:9583] List policy (was flamewar)

To: The LUG <tclug-list@mn-linux.org>
Subject: Re: [TCLUG:9583] List policy (was flamewar)
From: Scott Dier - dieman <dieman@ringworld.org>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 1999 01:12:48 -0500 (CDT)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.20.9910310047250.15315-100000@newton.pconline.com>

On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, Chris Kesler wrote:

> USENET.  Let's keep the ratio of useful-info/flame-war-crap high.  I'm not
> going to name names; you know who you are.

What is the official list policy on this?  Is this a proposal for a change
of list policy?  Shall there be some sort of process of changing list
policy?

---
Scott Dier <dieman@ringworld.org> #nicnac@efnet 612.301.0265
      destiny's admin       | <YodaNsO> fear leads to anger, 
 http://www.ringworld.org   |           anger leads to hate,
finger me for gnupg/pgp key |           hate leads to solaris.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TCLUG:9583] List policy (was flamewar)
  - From: Christopher Reid Palmer <reid@pconline.com>

References:
- flamewar
  - From: Chris Kesler <chris@pconline.com>

Prev by Date: flamewar
Next by Date: Re: [TCLUG:9583] flamewar
Prev by thread: flamewar
Next by thread: Re: [TCLUG:9583] List policy (was flamewar)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread