TCLUG Archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TCLUG:16341] Is Amanda being actively developed?

To: tclug-list@mn-linux.org
Subject: Re: [TCLUG:16341] Is Amanda being actively developed?
From: Chris Engstrom <bliss@bliss.treewax.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 10:45:33 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20000418102822.A3408@emt-p.org>
References: <20000417223232.R17113@enchanter.real-time.com> <20000418102822.A3408@emt-p.org>

very spendy i thought
On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 10:28:24AM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
<SNIP>
> 
> I'm very interested in Arkeia.  I haven't tried it yet, but it looks
> pretty spiffy.  I believe the server has to run on Linux (not positive
> about that) but they have clients for several architectures.
> 
> Ben
> 
> -- 
> "There is no spoon"
> 	-- The Matrix

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TCLUG:16341] Is Amanda being actively developed?
  - From: Ben Beuchler <insyte@emt-p.org>

References:
- Is Amanda being actively developed?
  - From: Bob Tanner <tanner@real-time.com>
- Re: [TCLUG:16341] Is Amanda being actively developed?
  - From: Ben Beuchler <insyte@emt-p.org>

Prev by Date: Packet logging (again)
Next by Date: Re: [TCLUG:16337] Personal Request...Re: [TCLUG:16324] scavenging laptops
Prev by thread: Re: [TCLUG:16341] Is Amanda being actively developed?
Next by thread: Re: [TCLUG:16341] Is Amanda being actively developed?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread