Re: [TCLUG:16341] Is Amanda being actively developed?

[Ben Beuchler <insyte@emt-p.org>]

On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 10:32:32PM -0500, Bob Tanner wrote:

> Well, I have been a big BRU fan, but now that we have gotten many
> machines that are not x86, BRU is loosing it's appeal.
> 
> So, I was looking at Amanda, but it looks like nothing has been done to
> it since Nov of 1998. 
> 
> What are the other choices of back (besides tar, cpio, dd, etc) for
> non-intel hardware?

I'm very interested in Arkeia.  I haven't tried it yet, but it looks
pretty spiffy.  I believe the server has to run on Linux (not positive
about that) but they have clients for several architectures.

Ben

-- 
"There is no spoon"
	-- The Matrix