Re: [TCLUG:13179] Firewall!!! (again)

["Brian Ackermann" <brian_ackermann@bbros.com>]

Yep,

The issue at stake here presently is to get a 'firewall' behaving exactly as if
there were none whatsoever, which is the way things were yesterday.  Once I'm
able to get all services to my users, then I'll be able to start narrowing down
the criteria.

But for the time being, I need the workstations to be able to communicate with
the servers at any cost, and to get printing working agian.

I'm almost there...Then I can delve into the actual filtering...

Brian
--


----------
>From: Nate Carlson <natecars@real-time.com>
>To: tclug-list@mn-linux.org
>Subject: Re: [TCLUG:13179] Firewall!!! (again)
>Date: Tue, Feb 1, 2000, 12:11 PM
>

> On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, Scott Dier - dieman wrote:
>
>> Still.
>>
>> Doing just a straight ALL is like asking for it.
>>
>> You need to quantify which IP's can do what to make this security scheme
>> effective.
>>
>
> Of course. I wasn't disagreeing (i wonder if that's a word..) with that
> fact. :)
>
> --
> Nate Carlson <carlson@real-time.com>    | Phone : (612)943-8700
> http://www.real-time.com                | Fax   : (612)943-8500
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe@mn-linux.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help@mn-linux.org
>
>