Re: [TCLUG:13229] win2k

[Ben Kochie <ben@nerp.net>]

this would be a cool comparison

redhat 6.1 -- win2k
base defaults.. workstation
things to compare

number of applcations (packages)
number of lines of code
number of developers

I really don't buy the "untested" thing, because if you look at the gnome
project, it's really not any less tested than win2k.. (puts up flame
shield)

Thank You,
        Ben Kochie (ben@nerp.net)

*-----------------------*  [ - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - ]
| Unix/Linux Consulting |  [ Haiku Error Message:          ]
|  PC/Mac Repair        |  [  Chaos reigns within.         ]
|   Networking          |  [  Reflect, repent, and reboot. ]
| http://nerp.net       |  [  Order shall return.          ]
*-----------------------*  [ - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - ]

 "Unix is user friendly, Its just picky about its friends."

On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Christopher Palmer wrote:

> On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Ben Kochie wrote:
> 
> > hey.. is anyone intrested in going to the windows 2000 launch on the 17th?
> > http://www.microsoft.com/twincities/windows2000/default.htm
> > 
> > I was thinking about burning a bunch of Corel Linux CD's or maybe even
> > redhat CD's.. I have access to an 8 disk 8x CD duplicator :)
> 
> Waaaiit a minute here, Ben. You mean you aren't going for the purpose of
> celebrating the launch of everyone's favorite world-class enterprise
> operating system?
> 
> Me niether.
> 
> We could just make a sign that says 'These CDs do *not* contain 35 million
> lines of untested code!' to advertise the Linux CDs.
> 
> 
> --
> Christopher Reid Palmer : www.innerfireworks.com
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe@mn-linux.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help@mn-linux.org
>