Re: [TCLUG:12912] SCSI advice

To: tclug-list@mn-linux.org
Subject: Re: [TCLUG:12912] SCSI advice
From: ^chewie <chewie@wookimus.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 10:22:05 -0800
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.20.0001270807520.9975-100000@garnet.tc.umn.edu>; from mend0070@tc.umn.edu on Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 08:11:13AM -0600
References: <20000126164828.A7774@omnifarious.mn.org> <Pine.SOL.4.20.0001270807520.9975-100000@garnet.tc.umn.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i

On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 08:11:13AM -0600, Philip C Mendelsohn wrote:

> Don't anyone get their knickers in a twist -- we've noticed a measurable
> diff. between longevity at high RPM vs. older low RPM drives, but really
> it's not worth worrying over, since the damn things are cheap anymore, so
> I for one would recommend them.

So, what's the difference between them?  You stated you noticed a
difference but didn't conclude what the difference was...

-- 
Chad Walstrom                         mailto:chewie@wookimus.net 
a.k.a ^chewie, gunnarr               http://wookimus.net/~chewie

PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TCLUG:12912] SCSI advice
  - From: Philip C Mendelsohn <mend0070@tc.umn.edu>

References:
- Re: [TCLUG:12912] SCSI advice
  - From: "Eric M. Hopper" <hopper@omnifarious.mn.org>
- Re: [TCLUG:12912] SCSI advice
  - From: Philip C Mendelsohn <mend0070@tc.umn.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: [TCLUG:13004] AP Comp. Sci.
Next by Date: Re: [TCLUG:13004] AP Comp. Sci.
Prev by thread: Re: [TCLUG:12912] SCSI advice
Next by thread: Re: [TCLUG:12912] SCSI advice
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread