RE: [TCLUG:269] EARLY release of Redhat

To: "'tclug-list@listserv.real-time.com'" <tclug-list@listserv.real-time.com>
Subject: RE: [TCLUG:269] EARLY release of Redhat
From: "Robert A. Hayden" <rhayden@means.net>
Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 12:46:59 -0500 (CDT)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NXT.3.93.980527133838.6298A-100000@othello.cs.umn.edu>

On Wed, 27 May 1998, Christopher Reid Palmer wrote:

> When the Red Hat crowd came to speak, Michael Johnson was saying that
> binaries compiled with glibc run faster and are more efficiently. Can
> anyone corroborate this? I'm curious.

I have this hanging on my wall in my office:

"More programming errors have been committed in the name of efficiency,
without actually achieving it."

 
=-=-=-=-=-=
Robert Hayden			rhayden@means.net	       UIN: 3937211
IP Network Administrator	http://rhayden.means.net
MEANS Telcom			(612) 230-4416

References:
- RE: [TCLUG:269] EARLY release of Redhat
  - From: Christopher Reid Palmer <jaymz@acm.cs.umn.edu>

Prev by Date: RE: [TCLUG:269] EARLY release of Redhat
Next by Date: Re: [TCLUG:269] EARLY release of Redhat 5.1
Prev by thread: RE: [TCLUG:269] EARLY release of Redhat
Next by thread: Re: [TCLUG:269] EARLY release of Redhat 5.1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread