Re: [TCLUG:676] Conert from exchange to sendmail

[Richard Seymour <rseymour@anarchysoftware.com>]

Exchange is the back end to M$'s stab at groupware. For instance to use
Outlook with a group calendar feature, they expect MS Exchange on the back
end. If the purpose is pretty much email, I think sendmail is a clearly
better option (less bloated). But if the shop is already very M$ oriented
and wants to use the groupware functionality, there is an argument for
Exchange.

On Thu, 16 Jul 1998, Michael Hicks wrote:

> Is there a significant advantage to using MS Exchange versus a normal
> POP server?  The company I work at right now wants to set up some
> Exchange servers at $4000 a pop to replace some old Lotus CC:Mail
> routers.  The company needs to have scheduling capability--is that
> handled client-side or server-side?
>
--
Richard Seymour, Anarchy Software, Inc.
anarchy@anarchysoftware.com

The opinions expressed are those of my employer, not my own.