[VANILLA-L:593] Re: Andrew Markiel's article

To: Multiple recipients of list <vanilla-l@anthrax.ecst.csuchico.edu>
Subject: [VANILLA-L:593] Re: Andrew Markiel's article
From: "Rob Lindenbusch" <lfcrob@dustbunny.physics.indiana.edu>
Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 13:23:26 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: vanilla-l@anthrax.ecst.csuchico.edu
Sender: vanilla-l@anthrax.ecst.csuchico.edu

On May 5,  1:00pm, Dave Ahn wrote:
> Subject: [VANILLA-L:591] Andrew Markiel's article
> After reading Andrew Markiel's response to my article on r.g.n., a thought
> occurred to me...why is it necessary to group observers into the same
> lot as players?  Wouldn't it be better to have an observer daemon that
> handles observers only, and leave daemonII/ntserv to handle real players?
> Sure, there would be some overlapping code, but it would be cleaner and
> more stream-lined...

This has been talked about before - specifically for the INL server. I seem to
recall someone built such a beast for the INL finals a few seasons back... or
perhaps it was just talked about.... anyone remember?


				Rob



-- 
			   Rob Lindenbusch
		Indiana University High Energy Physics
		 lfcrob@dustbunny.physics.indiana.edu
	     http://anthrax.physics.indiana.edu/~lfcrob/

Prev by Date: [VANILLA-L:594] Re: Andrew Markiel's article
Next by Date: [VANILLA-L:592] RE: Andrew Markiel's article
Prev by thread: [VANILLA-L:592] RE: Andrew Markiel's article
Next by thread: [VANILLA-L:594] Re: Andrew Markiel's article
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread