Re: [VANILLA-LIST:2740] That CLOAK_MAXWARP thing and a note about features

To: vanilla-list@us.netrek.org
Subject: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:2740] That CLOAK_MAXWARP thing and a note about features
From: James Cameron <quozl@us.netrek.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 11:18:01 +1100
In-Reply-To: <19991122145742.A7407@skyweir.jpl.nasa.gov>; from unbelver@brain.jpl.nasa.gov on Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 02:57:42PM -0800
Organization: Netrek Vanilla Server Dictator
References: <19991122145742.A7407@skyweir.jpl.nasa.gov>
Reply-To: quozl@us.netrek.org

G'day Carlos,

I thought the representation of cloak using a warp speed was a short
packets optimisation.  Since only four bits were available, the value
of 15 was used.

My pet gripe is that ships arriving at a starbase under transwarp cloak
for a short time.  Will what you have done fix this?

-- 
James Cameron   mailto:quozl@us.netrek.org   http://quozl.us.netrek.org/

References:
- That CLOAK_MAXWARP thing and a note about features
  - From: "Carlos Y. Villalpando" <unbelver@brain.jpl.nasa.gov>

Prev by Date: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:2740] That CLOAK_MAXWARP thing and a note about features
Next by Date: Re: That CLOAK_MAXWARP thing and a note about features
Prev by thread: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:2740] That CLOAK_MAXWARP thing and a note aboutfeatures
Next by thread: Re: That CLOAK_MAXWARP thing and a note about features
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread