Re: (ASCEND) Problems using an 1800's K56 modems with uucp

[Larry Williamson <larry@mitra.com>]

Josh Bailey <joshb@xtra.co.nz> writes:
 > On Sun, 23 Nov 1997, Oliver J. Albrecht <oj@nexus.flensbone.net> wrote:
 > 
 > > load. The problem is still under surveillance, but since we disabled 
 > > the term.serv. feature "Buffer Chars" last week, complaints by our 
 > > customers have dropped to zero.
 > 
 > We find best performance with term serv/telnet mode=binary, and buffer
 > chars=no. Buffer chars=yes gets erratic performance, and to get a clean 8
 > bits you need the "binary" mode.
 > 

Our application is 100% dialout uucp.

I had tried both telnet modes (transparent & binary) with no success.

I had never noticed this "Buffer Characters"  *feature*.  I will
disable it and try again.  Thanks.

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

References:

• Re: (ASCEND) Problems using an 1800's K56 modems with uucp
• From: "Oliver J. Albrecht" <oj@nexus.flensbone.net>
• Re: (ASCEND) Problems using an 1800's K56 modems with uucp
• From: Josh Bailey <joshb@xtra.co.nz>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Dialing to Denmark from Canada requires 56KR ?
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) GRF: up to it?
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Problems using an 1800's K56 modems with uucp
• Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Problems using an 1800's K56 modems with uucp
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread