No Subject

>No the Max does not send a trap with each session. That is a Cisco thing.
>We send a start and stop record via Radius or Tacacs+. Alternately, we
>record each event in an Event MIB. A trap is not the proper mechanism -
>it was not intended to be used in such a high volume environment.

Ok, thanks. I do not want to implement something `outside the specs' :-)

	Christian Vogel

Buergernetz Neumarkt * <A HREF="http://www.bene.baynet.de">http://www.bene.baynet.de</A>
Consider yourself disclaimed!

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	&lt;<A HREF="http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq">http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq</A>&gt;

</PRE>
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<HR>
<STRONG>References</STRONG>:
<UL>
<LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg10829.html">RE: (ASCEND) SNMP-Traps for Session Up/Down</A></STRONG></LI>
<UL>
<LI><EM>From</EM>: Ken Packert &lt;kpackert@ascend.com&gt;</LI>
</UL>
</UL>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<HR>
<UL>
<LI>Prev by Date:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg10873.html">Re: (ASCEND) linux snmp recommendations?</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Next by Date:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg10874.html">Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap33 woes ....</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Prev by thread:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg10836.html">RE: (ASCEND) SNMP-Traps for Session Up/Down</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Next by thread:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg10835.html">RE: (ASCEND) SNMP-Traps for Session Up/Down</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Index(es):
<UL>
<LI><A HREF="mail2.html#10872"><STRONG>Main</STRONG></A></LI>
<LI><A HREF="thrd246.html#10872"><STRONG>Thread</STRONG></A></LI>
</UL>
</LI>
</UL>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</BODY>
</HTML>