Re: [TCLUG:4337] Libraries?

["Scott K. Johnson" <skj@visi.com>]

Nate,

Thanks for the reply.

My 'ldd testprogram' looks as you say it should.  I've got libc.so.6,
and /lib/ld-linux.so.2.

The only thing that is different are the numbers inside the
parenthesis...

Any other thoughts?

Thank you!!

Scott K. Johnson
skj@visi.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Nate Carlson <natecars@infiniteloop.com>
To: TCLUG <tclug-list@listserv.real-time.com>
Date: Sunday, February 28, 1999 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: [TCLUG:4337] Libraries?


>Scott,
>
>Did the test program you compiled (in the howto instructions) show
only
>glibc2 libraries when you ran 'ldd testprogram'? It should look like
this:
>
>       libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40005000)
>       /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x2aaaa000)
>
>If you have libc.so.5 or /lib/ld-linux.so.1, something is wrong with
your
>glibc2 installation.
>
>----
>Nate Carlson
>the infinite loop
>natecars@infiniteloop.com
>
>On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Scott K. Johnson wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I've been goofing around trying to upgrade some of the libraries
I'm
>> using.
>>
>> I just moved to glibc.  There was a "how to", so I had the benefit
of
>> someone's experience with that.  Everything went according to how
the
>> doc said it should.
>>
>> Next, I'm trying to upgrade glib & gkt.
>>
>> After grabbing the source, I started working to get it up and
running.
>>
>> Working on glib first.  I ran ./configure, make, make check (all
tests
>> passed) and finally make install.
>>
>> Then I ran ldconfig.  It complained about libgmodule's appearing to
be
>> for multiple libc's.
>>
>> I figured I might have not "cleaned up" enough, and maybe had a
>> version of the old glib/gtk stuff somewhere.  I went through my
>> system, and deleted (I know, maybe not the smartest thing to do,
but
>> I'm Ok with rebuilding this box if I have to...).
>>
>> After deleting the old stuff, I ran ldconfig again, with no error
>> messages.
>>
>> Then, re- ./configure, make,make check (all test passed), and make
>> install'd glib over again.
>>
>> Ran ldconfig again, and got the same message.
>>
>> ldconfig: warning: /usr/local/lib/libgmodule.so appears to be for
>> multiple libc's
>> ldconfig: warning: /usr/local/lib/libgmodule-1.2.so.0.0.0 appears
to
>> be for multiple libc's
>> ldconfig: warning: /usr/local/lib/libgmodule-1.2.so.0 appears to be
>> for multiple libc's
>>
>> Now, it looks as if it may be a libc <??> thing as opposed to glib
>> <???>???  How is the relationship between the two?  If all went
well
>> upgrading to glibc according to the howto, shouldn't I be Ok?
>>
>> Am I safe to assume that this is related to the stuff I'm doing
with
>> glib, for the simple fact that the message from ldconfig started
>> showing up immediately after the build?  Or are there other things
I
>> should check?
>>
>> Any ideas/suggestions??
>>
>> Thanks for any help!!
>>
>> Scott K. Johnson
>> skj@visi.com
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
tclug-list-unsubscribe@listserv.real-time.com
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
tclug-list-help@listserv.real-time.com
>> Try our website: http://tclug.real-time.com
>>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe@listserv.real-time.com
>For additional commands, e-mail:
tclug-list-help@listserv.real-time.com
>Try our website: http://tclug.real-time.com
>
>