TCLUG Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TCLUG:6042] swap > 128M

On Sun, 16 May 1999, Nate Carlson wrote:

> Hmmm, that's odd. I know 2.1.x supported it out of the box... I had a
> 512mb swap file running fine once. Could be they decided to drop the
> feature..

Is there any chance you only *thought* it was seeing all 512MB, when in
reality it was just using the first 128MB? I've never heard of any
of Linux understanding swap partitions greater than 128MB in size.

-- Chris

---------(( Christopher Reid Palmer :