Re: [TCLUG:6042] swap > 128M

[Nate Carlson <natecars@infiniteloop.com>]

Nah, 'free' reported the full-size swap partition. It could be it was a
submitted patch that I applied that didn't get accepted in the final
kernels though..

----
Nate Carlson
the infinite loop
natecars@infiniteloop.com

On Tue, 18 May 1999, Christopher Reid Palmer wrote:

> On Sun, 16 May 1999, Nate Carlson wrote:
> 
> > Hmmm, that's odd. I know 2.1.x supported it out of the box... I had a
> > 512mb swap file running fine once. Could be they decided to drop the
> > feature..
> 
> Is there any chance you only *thought* it was seeing all 512MB, when in
> reality it was just using the first 128MB? I've never heard of any
> version
> of Linux understanding swap partitions greater than 128MB in size.
> 
> 
> -- Chris
> 
> ---------(( Christopher Reid Palmer : http://innerfire.visi.com/
> ))---------
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe@listserv.real-time.com
> For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help@listserv.real-time.com
> Try our website: http://tclug.real-time.com
>