Re: [TCLUG:14085] RAID 0 reliability

To: tclug-list@mn-linux.org
Subject: Re: [TCLUG:14085] RAID 0 reliability
From: Jon Schewe <jpschewe@eggplant.mtu.net>
Date: 25 Feb 2000 17:34:16 -0600
In-Reply-To: "Eric M. Hopper"'s message of "Fri, 25 Feb 2000 17:33:58 -0600"
References: <20000225173358.A14102@omnifarious.mn.org>
Reply-To: jpschewe@eggplant.mtu.net
Sender: jpschewe@eggplant.mtu.net
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) XEmacs/21.1 (Bryce Canyon)

"Eric M. Hopper" <hopper@omnifarious.mn.org> writes:

> 	I'm going to be setting someone up with two IBM IDE drives, and
> using software RAID to tie them together in a RAID 0 array.  How
> dangerous to you all think this is?

I've been running it on my file server at home for about 6 months now without
any problems.  It's event across IDE and SCSI drives of varying sizes and
ages.
-- 
Jon Schewe 
http://eggplant.mtu.net/~jpschewe
schewe@tcfreenet.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TCLUG:14085] RAID 0 reliability
  - From: "Eric M. Hopper" <hopper@omnifarious.mn.org>

References:
- RAID 0 reliability
  - From: "Eric M. Hopper" <hopper@omnifarious.mn.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [TCLUG:14085] RAID 0 reliability
Next by Date: Re: [TCLUG:14085] RAID 0 reliability
Prev by thread: Re: [TCLUG:14085] RAID 0 reliability
Next by thread: Re: [TCLUG:14085] RAID 0 reliability
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread