Re: [TCLUG:14085] RAID 0 reliability

To: tclug-list@mn-linux.org
Subject: Re: [TCLUG:14085] RAID 0 reliability
From: Nate Carlson <natecars@real-time.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 17:40:14 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To: <20000225173358.A14102@omnifarious.mn.org>

On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, Eric M. Hopper wrote:
> 	I'm going to be setting someone up with two IBM IDE drives, and
> using software RAID to tie them together in a RAID 0 array.  How
> dangerous to you all think this is?

Only "danger" is if one of your drive goes, you lose all data. So, each
drive you add on increases the chances of failure exponentially..

-- 
Nate Carlson <carlson@real-time.com>    | Phone : (612)943-8700
http://www.real-time.com                | Fax   : (612)943-8500

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TCLUG:14085] RAID 0 reliability
  - From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@visi.com>

References:
- RAID 0 reliability
  - From: "Eric M. Hopper" <hopper@omnifarious.mn.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [TCLUG:14085] RAID 0 reliability
Next by Date: something to drool over... E10K
Prev by thread: Re: [TCLUG:14085] RAID 0 reliability
Next by thread: Re: [TCLUG:14085] RAID 0 reliability
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread